4.4 Article

The In Vitro Genotoxic Effect of Tucuma (Astrocaryum aculeatum), an Amazonian Fruit Rich in Carotenoids

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL FOOD
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 1013-1021

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2012.0287

Keywords

Astrocaryum aculeatum; DNA damage; genotoxicity; PBMCs; tucuma

Funding

  1. FAPEAM
  2. FAPERGS
  3. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tucuma (Astrocaryum aculeatum) is an Amazonian fruit that presents high levels of carotenoids and other bioactive compounds such as quercetin. The extracts of tucuma peel and pulp present strong antioxidant activity which illustrate an elevated concentration that causes cytotoxic effects in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). This study performed additional investigations to analyze the potential genotoxic effects of the tucuma extracts on PBMCs. The genotoxicity was evaluated by DNA fragmentation, Comet assay, and chromosomal instability G-band assays. The acute tucuma extract treatment showed genoprotective effects against DNA denaturation when compared with untreated PBMC cells. However, in the experiments with 24 and 72h treatments to tucuma treatments, we observed low genotoxicity through a concentration of 100 g/mL, some genotoxic effects related to intermediary concentrations (100-500 g/mL), and more pronounced genotoxic effects on higher tucuma extract concentrations. After 24h of treatment, the reactive oxygen species were similar among treatments and PBMC control groups. However, the caspase-1 activity related to the apoptosis and pyroptosis process increased significantly in higher tucuma concentrations. In summary, tucuma extracts, despite their higher antioxidant content and antioxidant activity, would present PBMCs genotoxic effects that are dependent on concentration and time exposition. These results need to be considered in future in vitro and in vivo studies of tucuma effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available