4.7 Article

Exploring the Influence of the Protein Environment on Metal-Binding Pharmacophores

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 57, Issue 16, Pages 7126-7135

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jm500984b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH GM31749, R01 GM098435]
  2. National Science Foundation [MCB-1020765]
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  4. National Biomedical Computation Resource
  5. NSF supercomputer centers
  6. National Institutes of Health Molecular Biophysics Training Grant [2T32GM008326-21]
  7. SMART scholarship from the Office of the Secretary of Defense Test and Evaluation [N00244-09-1-0081]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The binding of a series of metal-binding pharmacophores (MBPs) related to the ligand 1-hydroxypyridine-2-(1H)-thione (1,2-HOPTO) in the active site of human carbonic anhydrase II (hCAII) has been investigated. The presence and/or position of a single methyl substituent drastically alters inhibitor potency and can result in coordination modes not observed in small-molecule model complexes. It is shown that this unexpected binding mode is the result of a steric clash between the methyl group and a highly ordered water network in the active site that is further stabilized by the formation of a hydrogen bond and favorable hydrophobic contacts. The affinity of MBPs is dependent on a large number of factors including donor atom identity, orientation, electrostatics, and van der Waals interactions. These results suggest that metal coordination by metalloenzyme inhibitors is a malleable interaction and that it is thus more appropriate to consider the metal-binding motif of these inhibitors as a pharmacophore rather than a chelator. The rational design of inhibitors targeting metalloenzymes will benefit greatly from a deeper understanding of the interplay between the variety of forces governing the binding of MBPs to active site metal ions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available