4.7 Article

Optimized Inhibitors of Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Improve in Vitro Target Residence Time and in Vivo Efficacy

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 57, Issue 16, Pages 7016-7030

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jm500694p

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIEHS [R01 ES002710]
  2. NIAMS [R21 AR062866]
  3. NIH CounterAct [U54 NS079202]
  4. NIEHS Superfund Research Program [P42 ES004699]
  5. NIH [R01 HL107887]
  6. Louisiana Governors' Biotechnology Initiative
  7. National Science Foundation [DBI-9871464]
  8. National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  9. National Center for Research Resources [P41RR015301-10]
  10. National Institute of General Medical Sciences from the National Institutes of Health [P41 GM103403-10]
  11. U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diabetes is affecting the life of millions of people. A large proportion of diabetic patients suffer from severe complications such as neuropathic pain, and current treatments for these complications have deleterious side effects. Thus, alternate therapeutic strategies are needed. Recently, the elevation of epoxy-fatty acids through inhibition of soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) was shown to reduce diabetic neuropathic pain in rodents. In this report, we describe a series of newly synthesized sEH inhibitors with at least 5-fold higher potency and doubled residence time inside both the human and rodent sEH enzyme than previously reported inhibitors. These inhibitors also have better physical properties and optimized pharmacokinetic profiles. The optimized inhibitor selected from this new series displayed improved efficacy of almost 10-fold in relieving pain perception in diabetic neuropathic rats as compared to the approved drug, gabapentin, and previously published sEH inhibitors. Therefore, these new sEH inhibitors could be an attractive alternative to treat diabetic neuropathy in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available