4.7 Article

Chiral 1,3,4-Oxadiazol-2-ones as Highly Selective FAAH Inhibitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 56, Issue 21, Pages 8484-8496

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jm400923s

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. The Centre of International Mobility (CIMO) [TM-09-6221]
  2. Academy of Finland [127653, 139140, 139620]
  3. Biocenter Finland/DDCB
  4. Swedish Research Council [12158]
  5. Research Funds of the Medical Faculty
  6. Umea University
  7. Marie Curie IEF fellowship
  8. Interdisciplinary Center for Mathematical and Computational Modeling (ICM), Warsaw, Poland [G30-18]
  9. Academy of Finland (AKA) [127653] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, identification of chiral 1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ones as potent and selective FAAH inhibitors has been described. The separated enantiomers showed clear differences in the potency and selectivity toward both FAAH and MAGL. Additionally, the importance of the chirality on the inhibitory activity and selectivity was proven by the simplification approach by removing a methyl group at the 3-position of the 1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-one ring. The most potent compound of the series, the S-enantiomer of 3-(1-(4-isobutylphenyl)ethyl)-5-methoxy-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2(3H)-one (JZP-327A, 51), inhibited human recombinant FAAH (hrFAAH) in the low nanomolar range (IC50 = 11 nM), whereas its corresponding R-enantiomer 52 showed only moderate inhibition toward hrFAAH (IC50 = 0.24 mu M). In contrast to hrFAAH, R-enantiomer 52 was more potent in inhibiting the activity of hrMAGL compared to S-enantiomer 51 (IC50 = 4.0 mu M and 16% inhibition at 10 mu M, respectively). The FAAH selectivity of the compound Si over the supposed main off-targets, MAGL and COX, was found to be >900-fold. In addition, activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) indicated high selectivity over other serine hydrolases. Finally, the selected S-enantiomers 51, 53, and 55 were shown to be tight binding, slowly reversible inhibitors of the hrFAAH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available