4.7 Article

Human metapneumovirus associated with community-acquired pneumonia in children in Beijing, China

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 1, Pages 138-143

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.23438

Keywords

human metapneumovirus; respiratory syncytial virus; community-acquired pneumonia; children; etiology; epidemiology

Categories

Funding

  1. National Major Science and Technology Research Projects for the Control and Prevention of Major Infectious Diseases in China [2009ZX10004-206, 2012ZX10004-206]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Community-acquired pneumonia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children worldwide. However, few studies have been conducted on the infection of human metapneumovirus (hMPV) associated with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia in China. Nasopharyngeal aspirates were collected between July 2008 and June 2010 from 1,028 children, aged =16.5 years, who were diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia in Beijing, China. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was used to screen the samples for hMPV and common respiratory viruses. hMPV was detected in 6.3% of the patients with community-acquired pneumonia. This detection rate is the third highest for a respiratory virus in children with community-acquired pneumonia, after that of rhinovirus (30.9%) and respiratory syncytial virus (30.7%). The detection rate of hMPV in 2008/2009 (42/540, 7.8%) was significantly higher than in 2009/2010 (23/488, 4.7%; ?2?=?4.065, P?=?0.044). The hMPV subtypes A2, B1, and B2 were found to co-circulate, with A2 being most prevalent. These results indicate that hMPV plays a substantial role in pediatric community-acquired pneumonia in China. Overall, these findings provide a better understanding of the epidemiological and clinical features of hMPV infections. J. Med. Virol. 85:138143, 2012. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available