4.7 Article

Assessment of Dried Blood Spot Samples as a Simple Method for Detection of Hepatitis B Virus Markers

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 9, Pages 1522-1529

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.22138

Keywords

HBV; filter paper; DBS; stability studies; ELISA

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)
  2. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) serological markers in dried blood spot (DBS) samples by enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) has not yet been fully optimized. In this study, the ability to detect three HBV markers (HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs) was evaluated in DBS samples using a modified commercial ELISA. Matched serum and DBS samples were obtained from individuals with or without a past history of HBV infection. Sera samples were tested according to the manufacturer's instructions, but for DBS testing, paper diameters, elution buffer, volume of input sample, and cut-off values were evaluated to optimize the assay. Stability studies were done on DBS stored at for up to 180 days at different temperatures. The absorbance values that yielded the maximum sensitivity and specificity were determined based on the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) and chosen as the cut-off value. Using this parameter, sensitivity was 90.5%, 97.6%, and 78% for anti-HBc, HBsAg, anti-HBs assays, respectively. Specificity was 92.6%, 96.7%, and 97.3% for anti-HBc, HBsAg, and anti-HBs assays, respectively. HBV markers could be detected in DBS samples until 63 days after sample collection at most temperatures, but storage at -20 degrees C yielded more consistent results. These results indicate that modified ELISA can be used to detect HBV markers in DBS samples, particularly if the samples are stored appropriately. J. Med. Virol. 83: 1522-1529, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available