4.7 Article

Development of a Consensus Microarray Method for Identification of Some Highly Pathogenic Viruses

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 81, Issue 11, Pages 1945-1950

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.21602

Keywords

virus; probe design; genus level; species level; microarray-based detection

Categories

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2007AA02Z406]
  2. National Science and Technology Section of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Some highly pathogenic viruses, such as Chikungunya virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, Yellow fever virus, Dengue virus, Hanta virus, SARS-CoV, and H5N1 avian influenza virus can cause severe infectious diseases. However, the consensus method for detecting these viruses has not been well established. A rapid and sensitive microarray approach for detection of these viruses and a panel of specific probes covering nine genera and 16 virus species were designed. 70-mer oligonuclecitides were used at the genus level and 50-mer oligonucleotides were at the species level, respectively. To decrease the interference of the host genome in hybridization, the consensus genus primers were designed and used to reverse transcribe only virus genome. The synthesis of the second strand was carried out with a random primer sequence (5'-GTTTCCCAGTAGGTCTCNNNNNNNN-3'). The amplified products were labeled and processed for microarray analyses. This microarray-based method used the highly conserved consensus primers to synthesize specifically the virus cDNA and could identify effectively Chikungunya virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, Yellow fever virus, Dengue virus, Tick borne encephalitis virus, and H5N1 avian influenza virus. Using this method, one unknown virus isolated from pig brain in Shanxi Province, China was identified. This method may have an important potential application for the diagnosis of virus infection. J. Med Virol. 81: 1945-1950, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available