4.7 Article

Variability of gB and gH genes of human herpesvirus-6 among clinical specimens

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 7, Pages 1211-1221

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.21205

Keywords

human herpesvirus 6; genetic variant; gB glycoprotein; gH glycoprotein; recombination

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The isolates of human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6), a betaherpesvirus closely related to human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), are classified as either variants A (HHV-6A) or B (HHV-6B) but their intravariant variability has not been studied extensively so far. The full-length genes of envelope glycoproteins gB and gH from 40 distinct HHV-6-DNA-positive specimens and 11 laboratory strains were amplified using PCR, and their nucleotide sequence determined. Nucleotide divergences were observed at 156 (6.2%) and 98 (4.7%) positions in the case of gB and gH genes respectively. Phylogenetic analysis, including reference strain sequences, confirmed the unambiguous distinction between HHV-6A and HHV-6B for both genes. In the case of HHV-6B isolates,two subgroups of gB gene (designated as gB-B1 and gB-B2) and two subgroups of gH gene (gH-B1 and gH-B2) were identified but the phylogenetic trees of both genes were not fully congruent with each other. The analysis of gB and gH protein sequences showed that 26 and 39 critical amino acid changes respectively permitted the unambiguous distinction between HHV-6A and HHV-6B. Among HHV-6B isolates, gB and gH gene subgroups were characterized by specific amino acid signatures made of six, and two residues respectively. The linkage unbalance between amino acid signatures as well as the distribution of crucial nucleotide changes strongly suggested the occurrence of intravariant recombination within gB gene among HHV-6B isolates. These results indicate that, as in the case of HCMV, homologous recombination may contribute to the genetic variability of HHV-6.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available