4.1 Article

Practical considerations for a method of rapid cardiac function analysis based on three-dimensional speckle tracking in a three-dimensional diagnostic ultrasound system

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASONICS
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 41-49

Publisher

SPRINGER TOKYO
DOI: 10.1007/s10396-009-0249-8

Keywords

Speckle tracking; 3D echocardiography; Strain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of our novel 3D speckle tracking method by using numerical data, and to demonstrate the rapid processing of this method by using data obtained from human subjects. In order to create a method that can rapidly assess cardiac function in regional heart wall segments, a 3D speckle tracking algorithm was created that focuses on data quality and performance. Prototype application software based on this algorithm was written to evaluate cardiac wall motion and to calculate indices such as strain. Time series 3D image data were generated for artificial numerical models that simulate the shape of the left ventricle and exhibit various types of motion. We compared observed values returned by the algorithm with expected values yielded by the models. This software was also applied to volume data of the human heart acquired by a 3D ultrasound system. Measurement of the indices was evaluated by using an error ratio that was a residual between an expected value and estimated one divided by the expected value. The average error ratio of the time series volumes was less than 5% for all indices, and no individual error ratio was more than 10% for numerical models. The process was complete within 0.5 s per frame for human heart volumes. This application software can provide good estimates of various wall motion indices. The results are similar to data from numerical models, and are provided quickly enough for routine clinical usage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available