4.4 Article

Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Journal

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 11, Pages 1961-1967

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-015-3133-3

Keywords

Tacrolimus; Nephrotic syndrome; Pharmacokinetics

Funding

  1. Christian Medical College Vellore, Tamilnadu, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tacrolimus has gained acceptance in the management of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in children. Due to limited data, therapeutic range is extrapolated from pediatric renal transplant recipients. This study was designed to assess therapeutic efficacy of tacrolimus in children with SRNS and its correlation with inter-dose area under concentration curve (AUC(0-12 h)) and trough concentration (C-0). Pre dose, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3, 4, 8, and 12 h after drug administration blood samples were collected in 25 children who were on tacrolimus for a minimum of 3 months and AUC(0-12 h) was calculated. There was an 80 % (20/25) response rate with 64 % (16/25) children achieving complete remission. Median C-0 in remission was higher than in relapse group (2.95 ng/ml, versus 1.20 ng/ml, p = 0.005). Median AUC(0-12 h) in remission was higher compared to those in relapse group (79.75 versus 35.15 mu g x h/l; p = 0.025). Maximum concentration after drug administration (Cmax) among the groups was not significantly different. There was a significant correlation between C-0 and AUC(0-12 h) (r = 0.79); and Cmax and AUC(0-12 h) (r = 0.84). Five patients had a rise in serum creatinine, of which four were still proteinuric and had lower C-0 and AUC(0-12 h). No other adverse effect was noted. Tacrolimus had beneficial clinical response in SRNS. Target C-0 and AUC(0-12 h) level for treatment remission was higher than those in relapse in children with SRNS but was lower than required in transplant recipient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available