4.3 Article

Characterization of the blaKPC-2 and blaKPC-3 genes and the novel blaKPC-15 gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages 981-987

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.073841-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Foundation of the Development Research Centre of Medical Technology in the Ministry of Health of China [W2012F2013]
  2. Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation [Y2100248]
  3. Foundation of the Department of Science and Technology of Zhejiang Province [2009C33155]
  4. Foundation of the Zhejiang Health Department [2009A218]
  5. Foundation of the Taizhou Science and Technology Bureau [081KY30, 102KY15, 1201KY22, 1301KY35]
  6. Zhejiang Province Chinese Medicine Study Foundation [2011ZA113]
  7. Foundation of the Jiaojiang Science and Technology Bureau of Taizhou, China [83041, 112071]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates exhibiting high-level resistance to carbapenem were analysed by PCR, PFGE, gene mapping, plasmid conjugation and Southern blot hybridization using a bla(KPC) probe. In addition to the frequently reported bla(KPC-2) and bla(KPC-3) genes, a novel bla(KPC-15) gene was identified in one of the isolates. The results of plasmid analysis and Southern blot hybridization revealed that the three bla(KPC) genes were located on transferable plasmids exhibiting three different patterns. The patterns A, B and C were observed in the genetic makeup of each individual plasmid, and all three structures contained ISKpn6-like and ISKpn8 transposons. The results of the gene mapping and hybridization experiments performed with the bla(KPC) probe demonstrated that the plasmids harboured the three genes at approximately the 85.0, 54.0 and 73.0 kb positions. The study concluded that carbapenem resistance in the three isolates was primarily due to the production of carbapenem-hydrolysing beta-lactamase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available