4.3 Article

Characterization of T-cell immunogenicity of two PE/PPE proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 9, Pages 1079-1086

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47565-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Indian Council for Medical Research, Government of India
  2. Colorado State University, USA
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [HHSN266200400091C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The PE and PPE proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis form a source of antigenic variation among different strains of this bacterium. Two of the PE_PGRS protein-encoding genes, rv3812 and rv3018c, are expressed in pathogenic mycobacteria and are implicated, respectively, in the persistence of the organism in macrophages and in virulence. Peptides derived from these proteins have been predicted to bind major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I with high affinity on the basis of immunoinformatics analysis, suggesting a possible role for these proteins in antimycobacterial immunity. In the present work, using DNA constructs containing the rv3812 and rv3018c genes of M. tuberculosis, the immunogenicity of these proteins was demonstrated in BALE/c mice. Immunization with either DNA construct induced a significant number of CD8(+)-type T cells and a strong Th1-type response, with high gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) and low interleukin-4 responses. Three nonameric peptides of Rv3812 and two of Rv3018c elicited a strong T-cell response in an MHC-restricted manner. An epitope-specific response was demonstrated by the lysis of peptide-pulsed antigen-presenting cells, release of perforin and IFN-gamma production. Experimentally, these peptides bound with high affinity to MHC H-2K(d) and showed low dissociation rates of peptide-MHC complexes. This study suggests that the identified T-cell epitopes may contribute to immunity against tuberculosis if included in a vaccine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available