4.5 Review

Human transgenerational responses to early-life experience: potential impact on development, health and biomedical research

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
Volume 51, Issue 9, Pages 563-572

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102577

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare [2008-1153, 2009-2022, 2010-1421]
  2. UK Medical Research Council [G1100226]
  3. Medical Research Council [G1100226] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G1100226] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mammalian experiments provide clear evidence of male line transgenerational effects on health and development from paternal or ancestral early-life exposures such as diet or stress. The few human observational studies to date suggest (male line) transgenerational effects exist that cannot easily be attributed to cultural and/or genetic inheritance. Here we summarise relevant studies, drawing attention to exposure sensitive periods in early life and sex differences in transmission and offspring outcomes. Thus, variation, or changes, in the parental/ancestral environment may influence phenotypic variation for better or worse in the next generation(s), and so contribute to common, non-communicable disease risk including sex differences. We argue that life-course epidemiology should be reframed to include exposures from previous generations, keeping an open mind as to the mechanisms that transmit this information to offspring. Finally, we discuss animal experiments, including the role of epigenetic inheritance and non-coding RNAs, in terms of what lessons can be learnt for designing and interpreting human studies. This review was developed initially as a position paper by the multidisciplinary Network in Epigenetic Epidemiology to encourage transgenerational research in human cohorts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available