4.5 Article

High rate of mosaicism in individuals with Cornelia de Lange syndrome

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages 339-344

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101477

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Academic Medical Center
  2. Prinsenstichting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) is a well known malformation syndrome for which five causative genes are known, accounting for similar to 55-65% of cases. In this study, we hypothesised that mosaicism might explain some of the similar to 35-45% of cases without detectable mutation in DNA derived from lymphocytes; we investigated the frequency of NIPBL mutations in buccal cells in individuals negative for mutations in any of the five genes in lymphocytes; and we evaluated the efficiency of obtaining DNA from buccal swabs and the best strategy for optimal mutation detection in CdLS. Methods Buccal swabs were obtained from eight mutation positive and 13 mutation negative individuals with clinically diagnosed CdLS, following informed consent. We then forwarded instructions and a single mouth swab to the families; if subsequently insufficient DNA was obtained, we re-sent two mouth swabs. Buccal cells were screened for NIPBL mutations using Sanger sequencing techniques. Results Sufficient DNA for analysis was obtained in 21/22 individuals. In all six tested individuals with a known NIPBL mutation and in two with a known SMC1A mutation, the mutation was confirmed in buccal cells. In 10 of the 13 tested individuals without detectable mutation in lymphocytes a NIPBL mutation could be detected in buccal cells. Clinically there were no significant differences between patients with a germline and mosaic NIPBL mutation. Conclusions Somatic mosaicism for an NIPBL mutation is frequent (10/44; 23%) clinically in reliably diagnosed CdLS individuals. Obtaining buccal swabs at the time a blood sample is obtained will facilitate adequate molecular analysis of clinically diagnosed CdLS patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available