4.3 Article

Laboratory Selection of Resistance to Spinosad in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae)

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 421-427

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1603/ME13173

Keywords

Culex quinquefasciatus; Diptera; Culicidae; spinosad; resistance development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A southern house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus Say colony was established from surviving late instars and pupae from a semifield evaluation on Natular XRG (a granular formulation containing 2.5% spinosad). The initial lethal levels of Natular XRG against this colony were determined in the laboratory for the first-generation progeny (designated as F-1). Selection pressure was applied at LC70-90 levels to 10,000-15,000 late third- and early fourth-instar larvae of each generation with Natular XRG. Susceptibility changes in response to selection were determined every other generation, where a gradual and steady decline in susceptibility occurred from generation F-1 to F-35, followed by significant decline from generations F-37 to F-45. For reference purposes, susceptibility of freshly collected wild populations as well as a laboratory colony of the same species was also determined concurrently, which fluctuated within a slightly wider range for the wild populations and a tighter range for the laboratory colony. By comparing with wild populations and laboratory reference colony, tolerance to spinosad was observed from generations up to F-9 in the selected population. Resistance levels increased gradually from generation F-11 to F-35, and elevated significantly from generations F-37 to F-45, when resistance ratios reached 1,415.3- to 2,229.9-fold at LC50 and 9,613.1- to 17,062.6-fold at LC90. Possible mechanisms of resistance development to spinosad were discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available