4.1 Review

SERUM AND URINARY BIOMARKERS DETERMINATION AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE IN DIAGNOSIS OF KIDNEY DISEASES

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 288-297

Publisher

SCIENDO
DOI: 10.2478/v10011-010-0046-3

Keywords

chronic kidney disease; acute kidney injury; biomarkers in the blood or urine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is becoming a major public health problem worldwide due to the epidemic increase of patients on renal replacement therapy and their high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The only effective approach to this problem is prevention and early detection of CKD. In addition, despite significant improvements in therapeutics, the mortality and morbidity associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) remain high. A major reason for this is the lack of early markers for AKI, and hence an unacceptable delay in initiating therapy. Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop biomarkers (proteins and other molecules in the blood or urine) for renal disease, which might assist in diagnosis and prognosis and might provide endpoints for clinical trials of drugs designed to slow the progression of renal insufficiency. Besides serum creatinine, promising novel biomarkers for AKI include a plasma panel (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin-NGAL and cystatin C) and a urine panel (NGAL, kidney injury molecule-1, interleukin-18, cystatin C, alpha1-microglobulin, Fetuin-A, Gro-alpha, and meprin). For CKD, these include a similar plasma panel and a urine panel (NGAL, asymmetric dime thylarginine, and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein). Increased plasma and urinary TGF-beta 1 levels might contribute to the development of chronic tubulointerstitial disease, indicating the possible therapeutic implications. Furthermore, to differentiate lower urinary tract infection and pyelonephritis interleukin-6 and serum procalcitonin levels were introduced. It will be important in future studies to validate the sensitivity and specificity of these biomarker panels in clinical samples from large cohorts and in multiple clinical situations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available