4.2 Article

Combining Spatial Filtering and Wavelet Transform for Classifying Human Emotions Using EEG Signals

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 45-51

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.5405/jmbe.710

Keywords

Electroencephalogram (EEG); Emotion assessment; Surface Laplacian filtering; Wavelet transform; K nearest neighbor (KNN); Linear discriminant analysis (LDA)

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [FRGS-9003-00214]
  2. Short Term Research Grant Scheme, Malaysia [UniMAP-9001-00191]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we present human emotion assessment using electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. The combination of surface Laplacian (SL) filtering, time-frequency analysis of wavelet transform (WT) and linear classifiers are used to classify discrete emotions (happy, surprise, fear, disgust, and neutral). EEG signals were collected from 20 subjects through 62 active electrodes, which were placed over the entire scalp based on the International 10-10 system. An audio-visual (video clips) induction-based protocol was designed for evoking discrete emotions. The raw EEG signals were preprocessed through surface Laplacian filtering method and decomposed into five different EEG frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma) using WT. In this work, we used three different wavelet functions, namely. db8, sym8 and coif5, for extracting the statistical features from EEG signal for classifying the emotions. In order to evaluate the efficacy of emotion classification under different sets of EEG channels, we compared the classification accuracy of the original set of channels (62 channels) with that of a reduced set of channels (24 channels). The validation of statistical features was performed using 5-fold cross validation. In this work, K nearest neighbor (KNN) outperformed linear discriminant analysis (LDA) by offering a maximum average classification rate of 83.04% on 62 channels and 79.17% on 24 channels, respectively Finally, we present the average classification accuracy and individual classification accuracy of two different classifiers for justifying the performance of our emotion recognition system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available