4.4 Article

The Outcomes of Children With Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Proceedings From the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference

Journal

PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages S118-S131

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000438

Keywords

acute lung injury; pediatrics; pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome; outcomes

Funding

  1. Department of Pediatrics, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine
  2. Health outcome axis-Ste Justine research center, Montreal, Canada
  3. Respiratory research network of Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Sante, Quebec, Canada
  4. Mother and children French-speaking network
  5. French-speaking group in pediatric emergency and intensive care (Groupe Francophone de Reanimation et Urgences Pediatriques), French-speaking intensive care society (Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise)
  6. Children's Hospital Foundation of Children's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University
  7. Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital at the University of Michigan
  8. Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  9. respiratory research network of Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Sante
  10. Reseau mere enfant de la francophonie
  11. Research Center of Ste-Justine Hospital
  12. NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To provide additional details and evidence behind the recommendations for outcomes assessment of patients with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. Design: Consensus conference of experts in pediatric acute lung injury. Methods: A panel of 27 experts met over the course of 2 years to develop a taxonomy to define pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome and to make recommendations regarding treatment and research priorities. The outcomes subgroup comprised four experts. When published data were lacking, a modified Delphi approach emphasizing strong professional agreement was used. Results: The Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference experts developed and voted on a total of 151 recommendations addressing the topics related to pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome, seven of which related to outcomes after pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. All seven recommendations had strong agreement. Children with acute respiratory distress syndrome continue to have a high mortality, specifically, in relation to certain comorbidities and etiologies related to pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Comorbid conditions, such as an immunocompromised state, increase the risk of mortality even further. Likewise, certain etiologies, such as non-pulmonary sepsis, also place children at a higher risk of mortality. Significant long-term effects were reported in adult survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome: diminished lung function and exercise tolerance, reduced quality of life, and diminished neurocognitive function. Little knowledge of long-term outcomes exists in children who survive pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Characterization of the longer term consequences of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome in children is vital to help identify opportunities for improved therapeutic and rehabilitative strategies that will lessen the long-term burden of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome and improve the quality of life in children. Conclusions: The Consensus Conference developed pediatric-specific recommendations for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome regarding outcome measures and future research priorities. These recommendations are intended to promote optimization and consistency of care for children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome and identify areas of uncertainty requiring further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available