4.2 Article

Maternal serum vitamin D levels in pregnancies complicated by neural tube defects

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 298-302

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.999037

Keywords

Calcium; calcium-rich dietary; neural tube defects; vitamin D

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The association between vitamin D deficiency and abnormal neural development has been proposed previously. We aimed to evaluate maternal serum vitamin D levels in pregnancies complicated by neural tube defects (NTDs) and compared them with healthy pregnant women.Methods: A total of 60 pregnant women were included in this controlled cross-sectional study. Thirty of the patients whose pregnancies were complicated by meningocele, meningomyelocele, encephalocele, anencephaly and fetal acrania constituted the study group, whereas 30 normal pregnant women constituted the control group. The main parameters recorded for each woman were as follows: age, body mass index (BMI), gestational week (GW), gravidity, abortion, co-morbidities, dressing style, consumption of milk and dairy products and serum levels of 25(OH)VitD(3), calcium, albumin and total protein.Results: The mean maternal serum 25(OH)VitD(3) level was 6.25.0ng/ml in the study group and 9.1 +/- 7.3ng/ml in the control group (p: 0.071). The mean maternal serum calcium level was statistically significantly higher in the control group, and calcium-rich dietary intake was also more common in this group (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of age, BMI, GW, dressing style and serum levels of albumin and total protein.Conclusions: Vitamin D deficiency is common among pregnant women, and maternal serum calcium levels were lower in pregnancies complicated by NTD than healthy pregnant women. Larger further studies are required to evaluate the effects of calcium-rich dietary sources or vitamin D and calcium in the development of NTDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available