4.2 Article

Breastfeeding practices in mothers of high-respiratory-risk NICU infants: impact of depressive symptoms and smoking

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages 1838-1843

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.805195

Keywords

Breastfeeding; depression; depressive symptoms; high-respiratory-risk infant; smoking; very-low-birth-weight

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Maternal and Child Health Research Program [R40MC08962]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Mothers of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) have very low breastfeeding rates and these high-respiratory-risk (HRR) NICU infants may benefit from breastfeeding through decreased risk for respiratory illnesses. This population's increased risk for maternal depression and high rates (22%) of maternal smoking may negatively affect breastfeeding. Objective: This exploratory study investigated associations of breastfeeding with depressive symptoms and maternal smoking in mothers of HRR NICU infants (i.e. presence of one household smoker and birth weight <1500 g or mechanical ventilation >= 12 h). Methods: Breastfeeding, depression and smoking data were collected from 104 mothers in the NICU following delivery. Results: Fifty-five (52.9%) mothers reported breastfeeding, 39 (37.5%) had a Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) score (>= 16) suggestive of depression, and 36 (34.6%) reported smoking. Mothers with CES-D scores >= 16 were less likely to breastfeed compared to those with scores <16 (38.5% versus 61.5%; p = 0.02). Breastfeeding and smoking were not significantly associated (p<0.10). Mothers of HRR infants with significant depressive symptoms who smoke have significantly lower breastfeeding rates (21%) than mothers who are not depressed and do not smoke (65%). Conclusions: Interventions to improve breastfeeding initiation and continuation that target depression and smoking are necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available