4.2 Article

Safety of low-dose prostaglandin E2 induction in grandmultiparous women with previous cesarean delivery

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 445-448

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.818651

Keywords

Grandmultiparous; induction; previous cesarean section; prostaglandins

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of labor induction with low-dose vaginal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in grandmultiparous women with a previous cesarean delivery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 219 grandmultiparous women with a previous cesarean delivery (study group) who underwent induction of labor with low dose PGE2. These patients were compared to 1376 grandmultiparous women without a previous cesarean section (control group) who underwent induction of labor with low dose PGE2. The primary outcome was uterine rupture and secondary outcomes included mode of delivery, post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) and a low 5-min Apgar score (<= 7). Results: One patient in the study group as well as one patient in the control group were diagnosed with uterine rupture (0.4% versus 0.07%). In the study group, vaginal delivery was achieved in 204 (93.16%) patients, whereas 15 (6.84%) patients had emergent cesarean delivery. Five minutes Apgar score <= 7 was recorded in two cases (0.9%) in the study group. Patients in the study group had a significantly higher rate of cesarean delivery (6.84%, versus 3.4%, respectively, p<0.001) as well as operative vaginal delivery (4.56% versus 2% respectively, p<0.05) compared to the control group. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the rate of PPH (0.91% versus 0.90%, p=0.2) or 5-min Apgar score <= 7 (0.91% versus 0.22%, p=0.28). Conclusions: Low dose PGE2 is a relative safe method for induction of labor in grandmultiparous women with a previous cesarean section.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available