4.2 Article

Maximum length sequence brainstem auditory evoked response in low-risk late preterm babies

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 536-540

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2010.501126

Keywords

Brain development; brainstem auditory evoked response; neonatal brain; preterm babies

Funding

  1. Children's Hospital, Fudan University
  2. University of Oxford

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. Recent research indicates that there is delayed development in the more central part of the auditory brainstem in very preterm babies. We aimed to study whether this is also the case for late preterm babies. Methods. The maximum length sequence brainstem auditory evoked response (MLS BAER) was used to study functional status of the auditory brainstem. Babies born at 33--36 week gestation and without any major perinatal complications were recruited. MLS BAER was recorded and analyzed at term age. Results. No significant correlation was found between most MLS BAER variables and physiological factors (gender, postconceptional age, bodyweight, and head circumference obtained at time of testing). Wave latencies and amplitudes, and I--V and I--III intervals in the preterm babies were essentially similar to those in the term controls at all click rates. However, III--V interval increased significantly at 227--910/s clicks (p < 0.05--0.01). All latencies, amplitudes and intervals correlated significantly with click rates (all p < 0.001). No differences were found in the slopes of MLS BAER variables--rate functions between the later preterm babies and term controls. Conclusions. Babies born at 33--36 weeks gestation without major complications had an increased III--V interval at high-rate stimulation. This suggests that late preterm babies have a mild delay in neural conduction in the more central part of the auditory brainstem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available