4.2 Article

Monitoring perinatal outcomes in hospitals in Kabul, Afghanistan: The first step of a quality assurance process

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 285-292

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14767050802464510

Keywords

Fetal death; cesarean section; perinatal outcomes; Afghanistan; quality assurance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Afghanistan is one of the countries with highest maternal and perinatal mortality in the world. Lack of reliable data, however, makes it difficult to select and prioritise the interventions that would be most cost effective. To gain some evidence, we review and analyse perinatal outcomes in facilities in Kabul and examine the role of patient risk and clinical practice factors. Methods. We used data for 2006 from a facility-based maternal and newborn surveillance system based on labour and delivery logbooks in the four government hospitals with maternity services in Kabul to analyse perinatal mortality and understanding potentially modifiable factors. Results. Data was collected for 53,524 births during 2006. Perinatal mortality was 43.5 per 1000 total births and the stillbirth rate was 38. For babies with a birthweight of 2500g, the risk of perinatal death if delivered by cesarean section was 3.57 (CI=3.08-4.13) times the risk of those delivered vaginally. Babies born of mothers with risk factors were 6.49 (CI=5.64-7.48) times more likely to die. The perinatal mortality rate in babies of women with risk factors undergoing cesarean section was 220.5 per 1000 total births. Conclusions. Facility-based monitoring of perinatal health is possible in resource-limited settings. The situation in hospitals in Kabul is precarious with high levels of perinatal mortality. Improved intrapartum care, especially for women with risk factors, is needed to positively impact perinatal health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available