4.7 Article

Similar gait action recognition using an inertial sensor

Journal

PATTERN RECOGNITION
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 1289-1301

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2014.10.012

Keywords

Gait action recognition; Inertial sensor; Heel strike detection; Sensor orientation robustness; Interclass relationship

Funding

  1. JSPS [21220003]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21220003] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper tackles a challenging problem of inertial sensor-based recognition for similar gait action classes (such as walking on flat ground, up/down stairs, and up/down a slope). We solve three drawbacks of existing methods in the case of gait actions: the action signal segmentation, the sensor orientation inconsistency, and the recognition of similar action classes. First, to robustly segment the walking action under drastic changes in various factors such as speed, intensity, style, and sensor orientation of different participants, we rely on the likelihood of heel strike computed employing a scale-space technique. Second, to solve the problem of 3D sensor orientation inconsistency when matching the signals captured at different sensor orientations, we correct the sensor's tilt before applying an orientation-compensative matching algorithm to solve the remaining angle. Third, to accurately classify similar actions, we incorporate the interclass relationship in the feature vector for recognition. In experiments, the proposed algorithms were positively validated with 460 participants (the largest number in the research field), and five similar gait action classes (namely walking on flat ground, up/down stairs, and up/down a slope) captured by three inertial sensors at different positions (center, left, and right) and orientations on the participant's waist. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available