4.5 Article

Patients' reports of barriers to expressing concerns during cancer consultations

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages 317-322

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.021

Keywords

Expressing concerns; Barriers; Communication; Healthcare providers; Cancer patients

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [022.003.037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To identify cancer patients' most influential barriers to expressing concerns during cancer consultations in a new manner by examining patients' reports of perceived barriers and perceived occurrence of barriers in consultations. Methods: Two online focus groups (N = 16) and an online survey (N = 236) were conducted among cancer patients and cancer survivors. The online focus groups and survey were used to examine two elements of patients' barriers, i.e., patients' reports of perceived barriers and perceived occurrence of barriers in consultations. Composite scores of these two elements were calculated to determine influential barriers. Results: Results showed that the most influential barriers were related to providers' behavior (e.g., providers do not explicitly invite patients to express concerns) and the environment where the consultation takes place (e.g., perceived lack of time). Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that influential barriers to expressing concerns are barriers that patients cannot overcome themselves (i.e., they are related to providers' behavior or the environment of the consultation). A collaborative approach between researchers, providers and policy makers is needed to overcome these barriers. Practice implications: The results of this study can be used to develop strategies to overcome barriers to patients expressing concerns. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available