4.6 Article

The thermal expansion coefficient as a key design parameter for thermoelectric materials and its relationship to processing-dependent bloating

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 48, Issue 18, Pages 6233-6244

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-013-7421-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-08-1-0613]
  2. Defense University Research Instrumentation Program (DURIP) [N00014-07-1-0735, N00014-09-1-0785]
  3. US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Program
  4. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic energy Sciences [DE-SC0001054]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) is a key design parameter for thermoelectric (TE) materials, especially in energy harvesting applications since stresses generated by CTE mismatch, thermal gradients, and thermal transients scale with the CTE of the TE material. For the PbTe-PbS-based TE material (Pb0.95Sn0.05Te)(0.92)(PbS)(0.08)-0.055 % PbI2 over the temperature ranges of 293-543 and 293-773 K, a CTE, alpha(avg), of 21.4 +/- A 0.3 x 10(-6) K-1 was measured using (1) dilatometry and (2) high-temperature X-ray diffraction (HT-XRD) for powder and bulk specimens. The CTE values measured via dilatometry and HT-XRD are similar to the literature values for other Pb-based chalcogenides. However, the processing technique was found to impact the thermal expansion such that bloating (which leads to a hysteresis in thermal expansion) occurred for hot pressed billets heated to temperatures > 603 K while specimens fabricated by pulsed electric current sintering and as-cast specimens did not show a bloating-modified thermal expansion even for temperatures up to 663 K. The relationship of bloating to the processing techniques is discussed, along with a possible mechanism for inhibiting bloating in powder processed specimens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available