4.6 Article

Electrospun carbon nanofibers with manganese dioxide nanoparticles for nonenzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensing

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 48, Issue 14, Pages 4843-4850

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-013-7202-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21065005, 21165010]
  2. Young Scientist Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20112BCB23006, 20122BCB23013]
  3. Foundation of Jiangxi Educational Committee [GJJ10389]
  4. Key Laboratory of Functional Small organic molecule, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Normal University [KLFS-KF-201214, KLFS-KF-201218]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon nanofibers (CNFs) decorated by manganese dioxide nanoparticles (MnO(2)NPs) are prepared by an electrospinning technique, followed by thermal treatments in different environments. The obtained MnO(2)NPs-CNFs composite was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). SEM images showed that the surface of the CNFs was decorated with homogeneously dispersed nanoparticles with narrow size distribution. XRD and XPS characterizations confirmed the main composition of the nanoparticles was MnO2. Furthermore, for the strong catalytic oxidation ability of MnO2 toward hydrogen peroxide, the composite material was used as the matrix for nonenzymatic sensor construction. Cyclic voltammetry and amperometric response were applied to investigate the performance of the sensor. Under the optimum conditions, a wide linear range from 10 mu M to 15 mM (R = 0.9994, R represents the correlation coefficient) with a low detection limit of 1.1 mu M was obtained. The proposed sensor also displayed short response time, high sensitivity, good reproducibility and stability. These superior performances could be attributed to the large surface area and excellent electrocatalytic activity of the MnO(2)NPs-CNFs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available