4.5 Article

Functional, interactive and critical health literacy: Varying relationships with control over care and number of GP visits

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 98, Issue 8, Pages 998-1004

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.006

Keywords

Health literacy; Patient control over care; Self-care; Interaction; Organization of care; Healthcare use

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the extent to which functional, interactive and critical health literacy are associated with patients' perceived control over care and frequency of GP visits. Methods: Data from the Dutch 'National Panel of People with Chronic Illness or Disability' was used (N = 2508). Health literacy was assessed by the Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy measure. Perceived control over care was indicated by perceived ability to organize care, interact with providers and to perform self-care. By multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses, associations between health literacy and perceived control over care and subsequently frequency of GP visits were studied. Results: Mainly interactive health literacy was associated with patients' perceived ability to organize care, interact with healthcare providers and perform self-care, whereas only functional health literacy was associated with number of GP visits. Conclusion: The results imply that some patients' may be less able to exert control over their care because of lower health literacy. Functional, interactive and critical health literacy vary in their relevance for patients' ability to exert control. Practice implications: Initiatives for strengthening patients' role in healthcare may be improved by paying attention to patients' health literacy, specifically functional and interactive health literacy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available