4.6 Article

Luminescence properties of double-perovskite Sr2Ca1-2x Eu x Na x MoO6 red-emitting phosphors prepared by the citric acid-assisted sol-gel method

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 1553-1559

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-009-4123-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education of China [20090022120002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundations of China [20876002, 20976002]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2082009, 2091002]
  4. College Student Research Innovation Program of China University of Geosciences, Beijing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Double-perovskite Sr2Ca1-2x Eu (x) Na (x) MoO6 red-emitting phosphors were prepared by the citric acid-assisted sol-gel method, and their luminescence properties were investigated as a function of sintering temperature and Eu3+-doping concentration. B-site substituted Sr2Ca0.8Eu0.1Na0.1MoO6 phosphor, in which Na+ ions act as charge compensators, was selected to study the thermal behavior, phase structure, microstructure, and photoluminescence property under different sintering temperatures. The photoluminescence studies on Sr2Ca1-2x Eu (x) Na (x) MoO6 (x = 0.02, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.2) show that a dominant red emission line at around 594 nm, which is due to the Eu3+ magnetic dipole transition of D-5(0)-F-7(1), is observed under different Eu3+ excitations (396 and 412 nm). Further, Eu3+ dopant content dependent emission spectra investigations of Sr2Ca1-2x Eu (x) Na (x) MoO6 phosphors indicates that, when the Eu3+ concentrations x = 0.05, there are minimum differences between the emission intensity of D-5(0)-F-7(1) transition at 594 nm and that of D-5(0)-F-7(2) transition at 615 nm. With increasing Eu3+ concentration, the variation of the emission intensities between the two transitions keep nearly invariable and Sr2Ca0.8Eu0.1Na0.1MoO6 phosphor has the strongest red emission in this series.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available