4.6 Article

Macroporous alumina monoliths prepared by filling polymer foams with alumina hydrosols

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 931-938

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-008-3189-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hi-tech Research and Development Program of China [2006AA05Z115, 2007AA05Z104]
  2. Cheung Kong Scholar Program for Innovative Teams of the Ministry of Education [IRT0641]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Macroporous alumina monoliths have been prepared for the first time by filling polystyrene foam templates with alumina hydrosols which were prepared from pseudo-boehmite. Polystyrene foam templates were obtained by polymerization in highly concentrated water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions. The organic templates were subsequently removed by calcination. The effects of filling times of the alumina hydrosols, calcination temperature, and CTAB surfactant addition in the hydrosols on the properties of the monolith have been investigated. TG, FT-IR, SEM, TEM, N-2 adsorption-desorption, and XRD techniques were used for characterization. The so prepared monoliths are the replicas of the polystyrene foams and are characterized with hierarchically porous structure. The macropores are interconnected and the macropore walls contain many meso and/or micropores. The hierarchically macro-meso-microporous structure can be controlled and tailored by adjusting the preparation conditions stated above and by addition of surfactant, and the organic components can be eliminated by high temperature calcination. When the calcination temperatures are 600 A degrees C and 900 A degrees C, the gamma-Al2O3 phases are obtained, with S-BET of 228 and 85 m(2) g(-1), respectively. When calcined at 1100 A degrees C, the alumina monolith presents a single theta-Al2O3 phase with S-BET of 80 m(2) g(-1). The 1300 A degrees C calcined sample takes on the single alpha-Al2O3 phase with S-BET of 5 m(2) g(-1) and compressive strength of 3.1 MPa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available