4.5 Article

Role of free volume in strain softening of as-cast and annealed bulk metallic glass

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 1405-1416

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1557/JMR.2009.0167

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Research Foundation (KRF), Korean Government, MEST [KRF-2006-331-D00273]
  2. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF), MEST [R012008-000-20778-0]
  3. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plasticity in amorphous alloys is associated with strain softening, induced by the creation of additional free volume during deformation. In this paper, the role of free volume, which was a priori in the material, on work softening was investigated. For this, an as-cast Zr-based bulk metallic glass (BMG) was systematically annealed below its glass transition temperature, so as to reduce the free volume content. The bonded-interface indentation technique is used to generate extensively deformed and well defined plastic zones. Nanoindentation was utilized to estimate the hardness of the deformed as well as undeformed regions. The results show that the structural relaxation annealing enhances the hardness and that both the subsurface shear band number density and the plastic zone size decrease with annealing time. The serrations in the nanoindentation load-displacement curves become smoother with structural relaxation. Regardless of the annealing condition, the nanohardness of the deformed regions is similar to 12-15% lower, implying that the prior free volume only changes the yield stress (or hardness) but not the relative flow stress (or the extent of strain softening). Statistical distributions of the nanohardness obtained from deformed and undeformed regions have no overlap, suggesting that shear band number density has no influence on the plastic characteristics of the deformed region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available