4.6 Article

Ink-jet printing and camera flash sintering of silver tracks on different substrates

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 210, Issue 15, Pages 2268-2272

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.08.014

Keywords

Ink-jet printing; Silver conductors; Camera flash sintering; PI and PET substrates

Funding

  1. Hong Kong SAR Government's Innovation and Technology Commission [ITS/073/08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A camera flash-lamp, which makes use of the enhanced photothermal effect in silver nanoparticles, was used for sintering of ink-jet printed silver tracks on Polyimide (PI). Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) and photographic paper at room temperature. After the camera flashing the nonconductive tracks was changed and became conductive. The resistivity of all tracks on different substrates was decreased after the first flashing and the second flashing, while it exhibited a slight increase after the third and forth flashing. Irrespective of the number of flashings, the silver track printed on the PET substrate had the lowest resistivity and it can reach 6.2 mu Omega cm after the second flashing, while the track that was printed on the photographic paper had the highest measured resistivity due to defects in the substrate. The thermal conductivity of the substrate had an important effect on the microstructure of the silver tracks after the flashing. The nanoparticles within the tracks printed on the photographic paper exhibited significant melting after flashing sintering. This melting was due to very low thermal conductivity of the photographic paper and slow heat dissipation to the substrate and the surroundings. The nanoparticles on the PI substrate exhibited less appreciable melting due to greater thermal conductivity of the PI and fast heat dissipation to the substrate and the surroundings. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available