4.6 Article

Research on gripping conditions in profile ring rolling of raceway groove

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 209, Issue 6, Pages 2794-2802

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.06.033

Keywords

Ring rolling; Profile ring rolling of raceway groove; Gripping; FE simulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50675164]
  2. Special Foundation of Chinese University [20060497014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ring gripping means that under the pressure of roll and friction, ring grips the rolling gap and produces rotating rolling motion, thus ring thickness receives equal rolling and the outer diameter expands equally, and this is a sufficient condition for ring rolling forming. In this paper, gripping course in profile ring rolling of raceway groove is analyzed based on ring rolling principle and static theory. The gripping mechanical model for profile ring rolling of raceway groove is established, and gripping conditions are researched according to the geometrical relationship in rolling. The results indicate that ring could be ensured to continuously grip the gap in rolling by controlling feed per revolution and preventing it from exceeding the maximum feed per revolution allowed by ring gripping. Furthermore, influencing factors of gripping conditions are analyzed. At last, the experiments and the FE simulation for profile ring rolling of raceway groove are performed to testify the validity of gripping conditions. Both the experimental and simulation results show that when feed satisfies gripping conditions, ring can continuously grip the gap and be formed by rolling. Otherwise, ring cannot grip the gap and is squashed between the rolls. The results of this research provide a theoretical basis for design of technological parameters of profile ring rolling of raceway groove. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available