4.6 Article

Characterization and modelling of the residual stresses induced by belt finishing on a AISI52100 hardened steel

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 208, Issue 1-3, Pages 187-195

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.133

Keywords

Hard turning; Belt finishing; Superfinishing; Residual stresses; Finite element model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New technological process consisting of hard turning (HT) followed by abrasive machining, in place of the widely used method in industry, e.g., hard turning versus grinding, has lately been launched in the automotive industry. This is because, many transmissions parts, such as synchronizing gears, crankshafts and camshafts require superior surface finish along with appropriate fatigue performance. This paper provides a comprehensive characterization of part residual stresses produced in dry turning of a hardened AISI52100 bearing steel using PCBN tools, and also its modification after a special abrasive finishing operation, i.e. belt finishing. The residual stresses generated in hard turning or in 'hard turning + belt finishing' are investigated by two complementary ways: an experimental Xray diffraction characterization after each step of the process, and a finite element model of the belt finishing operation in order to bring an understanding of the experimental results. Additionally the sensitivity of some parameters such as the lubrication and the indentation force during belt finishing are investigated. it has been shown that the belt finishing process improves very significantly the surface integrity by the induction of strong compressive residual stresses in the external layer and by a great improvement of the surface roughness. Among the process parameters of the belt finishing technique, the lubrication appears as a key parameter to get compressive stresses. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available