4.6 Article

Influence of Wet-Dry Cycles on Compressive Strength of Calcium Carbide Residue-Fly Ash Stabilized Clay

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 633-643

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000853

Keywords

Fly ash; Durability; Clays; Compressive strength; Calcium; Calcium carbide residue; Fly ash; Wet-dry cycle; Durability; Pozzolanic reaction; Clay stabilization

Funding

  1. Suranaree University of Technology
  2. Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of Higher Education Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article studies the durability of the calcium carbide residue (CCR) and fly ash (FA) stabilized silty clay against wetting and drying cycles to ascertain its performance in pavement applications. The durability test on the CCR-FA stabilized clay samples compacted on dry and wet sides of optimum was performed according to the ASTM. The mixture of CCR and FA can be used for soil stabilization instead of ordinary portland cement. The suitable ingredient of CCR, FA, and clay results in a moderately high strength and durability geomaterial. The durability against wetting and drying (w-d) cycles of the CCR stabilized clay is considered low according to the recommendations of the American Concrete Institute and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and is not accepted as a pavement material. The input FA at optimal content reacts with the excess Ca(OH)2 from the CCR, and hence a significant improvement of the strength and durability. The optimal FA content is found at about 20%. The strength analysis shows that the durability is directly related to the unsoaked strength (prior to the w-d cycles). Consequently, a relationship between the w-d cycle strength and unsoaked strength is proposed. It is useful for quick determination of unsoaked strength during mix design to attain the target strength at the design service life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available