4.6 Article

Characterizing Lightweight Aggregate Desorption at High Relative Humidities Using a Pressure Plate Apparatus

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 961-969

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000422

Keywords

Desorption isotherm; Drying shrinkage; Internal curing; Lightweight aggregate; Moisture retention; Porous plate apparatus; Pressure membrane extractor; Pressure plate; Self-desiccation; Shrinkage cracking

Funding

  1. Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate Institute (ESCSI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes the results of an experimental study that was performed to obtain desorption isotherms for a wide range of fine lightweight aggregates that are used commercially in North America. The desorption isotherms were determined for the entire gradation of the fine lightweight aggregates (as received). To obtain the desorption isotherms a pressure plate apparatus (porous plate) was used. The pressure plate enables the desorption isotherm to be measured at high relative humidities (beginning at 100%). In addition to providing experimental results obtained with the pressure plate method, desorption results obtained by gravimetric desorption and dynamic vapor desorption methods are also provided. The gravimetric desorption and dynamic vapor desorption methods are generally used at lower relative humidities (98% and 0% relative humidity). The results indicate that water leaves the fine lightweight aggregates at relative humidities as high as 99.9%. This suggests that internal curing water is available to the cement matrix even at relatively high water-to-cement ratio mixtures when the suction forces exerted by cement paste are small. The results of this work are helpful for the development of mixture proportioning techniques and numerical simulation for internally cured concrete mixtures. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000422. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available