4.3 Article

Controllable synthesis of brookite/anatase/rutile TiO2 nanocomposites and single-crystalline rutile nanorods array

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages 7937-7944

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2jm16628c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90923012]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2009AA03Z218]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [200806980023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The synthesis of nano-TiO2 materials have attracted intense interest due to their importance in a wide area of applications. In this study, we report a facile method to synthesize mixed-phase TiO2 nanocomposites by using a one-step approach under mild solvothermal conditions. Differently from previous reports, this method not only yields rutile/brookite/anatase TiO2 nanocomposites with high photocatalytic activities, but also can obtain highly oriented single-crystal rutile nanorod arrays selectively deposited on FTO. These products were characterized by XRD, FTIR, FESEM, TEM, HRTEM, and BET. Results indicate that in the brookite/anatase/rutile coexisting nanopowders, the brookite and anatase phases were crystallized into irregular nanoparticles <20 nm in diameter, whereas the rutile phase was crystallized into single-crystalline nanorods similar to 20 nm in diameter and 100 to 500 nm in length. The single-crystalline rutile nanorods could form a film with controllable thickness up to similar to 7 mu m. The sample with 29.9% anatase, 27.9% brookite, 42.2% rutile was shown to have the highest photocatalytic activity, yielding over 90% bleaching of methyl orange solution in 20 min. The degradation rate constant k of this sample was 0.10180 min(-1), almost twice as high as that of P25 (k = 0.05397 min(-1)). DFT calculations were used to confirm the band structures and density of states in brookite, anatase, and rutile phases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available