4.3 Article

The effect of microsized roughness in nano/microsized hierarchical surfaces replicated from a lotus leaf on the activities of osteoblast-like cells (MG63)

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
Volume 22, Issue 15, Pages 7584-7591

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2jm16765d

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the challenges in tissue engineering is the design of optimal biomedical scaffolds, which can be governed by both physical and chemical properties, such as structural properties (porosity, pore size, and tortuosity) and surface characteristics. Of these properties, we observed the effects of nano-to microsized hierarchical surface. To achieve the hierarchical surface structure on poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) film, we employed an electric-field-aided nano/micro-casting technique (FA-NCT) to mimic a typical natural hierarchical structure, the lotus leaf. The sizes of the microsized structures in lotus leaf replicas were controlled by employing or not employing the electric field during casting. The hierarchical surfaces showed two different roughness ranges for the microsized structure and the nanosized structure: (1) 1.7 +/- 0.2 mu m and 627 +/- 163 nm and (2) 3.2 +/- 0.3 mu m and 635 +/- 127 nm, respectively. To reduce the hydrophobicity in the replicated surfaces, they were coated with phlorotannin (Ph), which is derived from brown algae and has been used as a tissue regenerating material due to its hydrophilicity and various growth factors. Osteoblast-like-cells (MG63) were cultured on various surfaces. The hierarchical structure induced high cell viability compared to that of the smooth surface. Moreover, calcium deposition was enhanced when the roughness of the microsized structures in the hierarchical structure was increased. From the results, we suggest that control of the formation of micro-structure in a hierarchical structure is an important design factor along with the optimal nanostructure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available