4.3 Article

Novel microwave dielectric response of Ni/Co-doped manganese dioxides and their microwave absorbing properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
Volume 22, Issue 35, Pages 18291-18299

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2jm33124a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51007005]
  2. National Science and Technology support plan for twelfth five years of China [2012BAJ02B04]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20090041120038]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A facile redox reaction between KMnO4 and MnSO4 was carried out to investigate the dielectric response and microwave absorbing properties of Ni/Co-doped MnO2. The samples were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and vector network analysis. The analysis results revealed that the powders were alpha-MnO2 with one-dimensional nanostructure. The doping of Ni/Co had a certain effect on the dielectric properties: the relative complex permittivity showed a more distinct dielectric response characteristic, and the imaginary part exhibited a great enhancement of 2-18 GHz, which resulted in controllable wave-absorbing properties. The microwave absorbing bandwidth (RL < -10 dB) for Co-doped MnO2 was located at 10.96-16.13 GHz with a thickness of 2 mm. Furthermore, the Debye equation was introduced to explain the novel microwave dielectric response of doped MnO2. Some other properties derived from dielectric performances were also investigated, such as dielectric loss tangent and dielectric conductivity. In particular, first-principles calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) were used to uncover the relationship of electronic structure and dielectric properties on the microscopic scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available