4.3 Article

Controlled synthesis of SnO2@carbon core-shell nanochains as high-performance anodes for lithium-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
Volume 21, Issue 33, Pages 12295-12302

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1jm11364j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. South China Agricultural University
  2. NSF of China [20963002, 51064004]
  3. Ministry of Education [208108]
  4. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [9151064201000039]
  5. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2009B010900025]
  6. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [0832099]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new low-flow-rate inert atmosphere strategy has been demonstrated for the synthesis of perfect SnO2@carbon core-shell nanochains (SCNCs) by carbonization of an SnO2@carbonaceous polysaccharide (CPS) precursor at a relatively high temperature. This strategy results in the thorough carbonization of CPS whilst avoiding the carbothermal reduction of SnO2 at 700 degrees C. It has been investigated that a moderate carbon content contributes to the 1-D growth of SCNCs, and the thickness of the carbon shell can be easily manipulated by varying the hydrothermal treatment time in the precursor process. Such a unique nanochain architecture could afford a very high lithium storage capacity as well as resulting in a desirable cycling performance. SCNCs with about 8 nm carbon shell synthesized by optimized routes were demonstrated for optimal electrochemical performances. More than 760 mAh g(-1) of reversible discharge capacity was achieved at a current density of 300 mA g(-1), and above 85% retention can be obtained after 100 charge-discharge cycles. TEM analysis of electrochemically-cycled electrodes indicates that the structural integrity of the SnO2@carbon core-shell nanostructure is retained during electrochemical cycling, contributing to the good cycleability demonstrated by the robust carbon shell.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available