4.3 Article

Controllable growth of highly N-doped carbon nanotubes from imidazole: a structural, spectroscopic and field emission study

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
Volume 20, Issue 20, Pages 4128-4134

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b923139k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS [18560661]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we report the highest N-doping level achieved so far for carbon nitride (CNx) nanotubes by using a new precursor imidazole (as a dual supplier of carbon and nitrogen) together with ferrocene (as a catalyst). A controllable growth of aligned CNx nanotubes was achieved by simple CVD in a temperature range of 700 -950 degrees C leading to nitrogen doping from 12.1 to 25.7 at%. The highest doping level was achieved at 850 degrees C, which is attributed to the abundance of C-N fragments at this decomposition temperature. Nitrogen doping level and the type of N-moieties were determined by XPS and EELS analyses. HRTEM analysis suggests that N-substituted graphitic units (gN) give rise to fullerenic curvature into the cylindrical graphite layers (leading to curled side-wall morphology), whereas pyridinic units (pN) break the graphitic continuity (leading to dangling bonds on the side walls). It is observed that the abundance of N-substituted graphitic units (gN) enhances the electrical conductivity of individual nanotubes by donating additional electrons to the CNT network. The field emission (FE) characteristics show that the increase of N doping from 19.6 at% to 25.7 at% effectively reduces the turn-on field (for 10 mu A cm(-2)) from 1.92 V mu m(-1) to 0.88 V mu m(-1), whereas the threshold field (for 10 mA cm(-2)) decreases from 4.05 V mu m(-1) to 2.32 V mu m(-1). However, at high growth temperature (950 degrees C), the N-doping level decreases to 12.1 at%, thereby degrading the FE performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available