4.4 Article

Sulfides: chemical ionization induced fragmentation studied with Proton Transfer Reaction-Mass Spectrometry and density functional calculations

Journal

JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 367-378

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jms.3153

Keywords

Proton Transfer Reaction-Mass Spectrometry; sulfide; chemical ionization; fragmentation; density functional theory

Funding

  1. Austrian Ministry of Science
  2. RFBR / FWF [09-03-91001a, I200-N19]
  3. National Science Technology Development Agency
  4. National Science Technology Development Agency (NANOTEC Center for Nanoscale Materials Design for Green Nanotechnology)
  5. Commission on Higher Education, Ministry of Education
  6. Provincia Autonoma di Trento
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I 200] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I200] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the energy-dependent fragmentation patterns upon protonation of eight sulfides (organosulfur compounds) in Proton Transfer Reaction-Mass Spectrometry (PTR-MS). Studies were carried out, both, experimentally with PTR-MS, and with theoretical quantum-chemical methods. Charge retention usually occurred at the sulfur-containing fragment for short chain sulfides. An exception to this is found in the unsaturated monosulfide allylmethyl sulfide (AMS), which preferentially fragmented to a carbo-cation at m/z 41, C3H5+. Quantum chemical calculations (DFT with the M062X functional 6-31G(d,p) basis sets) for the fragmentation reaction pathways of AMS indicated that the most stable protonated AMS cation at m/z 89 is a protonated (cyclic) thiirane, and that the fragmentation reaction pathways of AMS in the drift tube are kinetically controlled. The protonated parent ion MH+ is the predominant product in PTR-MS, except for diethyl disulfide at high collisional energies. The saturated monosulfides R-S-R' (with R

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available