4.4 Article

Kinetic-energy-sensitive mass spectrometry for separation of different ions with the same m/z value

Journal

JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 43, Issue 12, Pages 1686-1691

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jms.1459

Keywords

kinetic energy; superconducting detector; electron ionization; diatomic molecule; double-focusing mass spectrometer

Funding

  1. JST-SENTAN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A double-focusing mass spectrometer (MS) equipped with a superconducting-tunnel-junction (STJ) detector has been applied to measure relative ionization cross-sections for the production of ions that are accompanied by different ion species with the same mass-to-charge (m/z) value. The STJ detector fabricated for this study enables kinetic energy (E) measurement of incoming individual ions at a counting rate of up to similar to 100 k ions/s and an energy resolution (Delta E/E) of 15%. Both high counting rate and high-energy resolution are necessary to independently determine both m and z and not the m/z value only in ion-counting MS experiments. Ions such as N-14(2)2+ and N-14(+) with the same m/z value can be clearly discriminated using a kinetic-energy-sensitive MS. This fine discrimination capability allows direct determination of relative ionization cross-sections of the homonuclear diatomic ions (N22+/14N22+)-N-14 and (O22+/16O2+)-O-16, which are difficult to measure due to the strong interference by the signals of their dissociated atomic ions with noticeably large ionization cross-sections. The new instrument requires no low-abundance heteronuclear diatomic molecules of the forms (NN)-N-14-N-15 or (OO)-O-16-O-17 to carry out ionization studies and thus, is expected to be useful in fields such as atmospheric science, interstellar science, or plasma physics. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available