4.5 Article

Cold-front-induced flushing of the Louisiana Bays

Journal

JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS
Volume 82, Issue 4, Pages 252-264

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2010.05.015

Keywords

Cold fronts; Bay flushing; Subtidal barotropic oscillations; Alongshore and cross-shore winds; Louisiana coast

Funding

  1. NOAA NGoMex [NA06NPS4780197]
  2. NOAA's Office of Ocean and Atmospheric Research, U.S. Department of Commerce and Shell [NA06OAR4320264 06111039]
  3. Louisiana Board of Regents [NNS05AA95C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water level variations were used to calculate cold-front-induced water exchange fluxes for three Louisiana bays. Twenty-nine cold fronts were identified from weather maps between September 2006 and April 2007. Cold front passages cause water to flush out of the bays, with large variability in volume fluxes. Due to the differences in water body area and basin geometry, the Atchafalaya/Vermilion Bays have exchange rates an order of magnitude higher than the Barataria Bay. We identified five largest flushing events which were all associated with migrating extra-tropical cyclones with frontal orientations perpendicular to the coastline, suggesting that wind direction is an important component in determining the flushing rate. Both alongshore and cross-shore winds play important roles in bay-shelf water exchange, and northwest winds appeared to be most effective in flushing the bays. Strong cold fronts may flush more than 40% of the bay waters out onto the continental shelf within a less than 40-hour period. An analytical model is applied for the cold front wind induced flushing process which reveals that the amplitudes of water level variations induced by alongshore and cross-shore winds have the same order of magnitude, indicating that they play almost equally important roles in driving the subtidal water level changes inside the bays. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available