4.5 Article

An integrated water/sediment approach to study plankton (a case study in the southern Adriatic Sea)

Journal

JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS
Volume 78, Issue 4, Pages 536-546

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.12.023

Keywords

Resting stages; Cyst bank; Plankton; South Adriatic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In marine coastal areas many planktonic species produce resting stages (cysts) that sink to the bottom. Integrated sampling from both the water column (to collect active stages). and sediments (to collect cysts), could be useful to achieve more complete information about plankton composition. In the framework of the INTERREG II Albania-Italy Project an oceanographic survey was carried out aboard the r/v Italica from 20 to 31 October 2000. The survey interested the northern Albanian coast (Gulf of Drin) and the northern Apulian coast (Gulf of Manfredonia) on the opposite sides of the South Adriatic Sea. The plankton was collected from 14 stations. A total of 188 categories were recognized in plankton samples. Among those categories, 130 species were recognized (87 of phytoplankton, 43 of microzooplankton), and only 53 (40.8%) resulted common to both the Adriatic sides. A total of 69 cyst morphotypes were recognized in sediment samples; 38 of them were classified at the level of species. A statistical analysis of the microzooplankton species abundance showed a segregation of the two areas better than that obtained with the phytoplankton. Cyst distribution in the sediments showed a good gulf-segregation too. In addition, they allowed us to find complementary information, particularly for dinoflagellates. The most abundant species in the water column were not equally dominant as resting stages in the sediments. Sediment sampling allowed further information about the composition of the plankton communities, and suggested us to search for a new method to enhance the yield of less abundant cysts. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available