4.2 Article

Soil erosion susceptibility maps of the Janare Torrent Basin (Southern Italy)

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAPS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 435-447

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.4113/jom.2010.1116

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil erosion susceptibility mapping provides a classification of the land surface into zones each of which has a different likelihood, or risk, of experiencing specific soil erosion processes. Such maps are fundamental to land-use planning aimed at the conservation of soil resources. In this paper, 1: 46,500 scale maps showing susceptibility to different soil erosion processes (sheet/rill erosion, gully erosion and landslide-induced mass erosion) are presented. The study was carried out in the 10.5 km(2) Janare Torrent basin, located in Southern Italy. The basin was first characterized by lithology, morphology and land-use. Landslides, gullies and landsurfaces affected by intense sheet and/or rill erosion were then surveyed and mapped by integrating the analysis of aerial photos and topographic maps with field observations. Using ArcView GIS 3.2, the densities of each type of erosional landform in each lithological, slope, aspect and land-use class were obtained by means of intersection procedures. From densities, weights expressing the susceptibility to soil erosion of each class were calculated using bivariate statistical analysis. The thematic maps were then reclassified according to the calculated weights and overlaid using a GIS, thus calculating the soil erosion susceptibility value for each point in the study area. The ranges of susceptibility values were subdivided into four classes to produce the final susceptibility maps. The procedure is based on the processing of directly surveyed, mapped and interpreted data, is easy to apply, allows frequent updating of the susceptibility assessment, and is scientifically reliable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available