4.5 Article

Identifying factors of bicycle comfort: An online survey with enthusiast cyclists

Journal

APPLIED ERGONOMICS
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 124-136

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.07.010

Keywords

Comfort & human perception; Cyclists; Multidimensional statistics analysis

Funding

  1. National Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada [CRDPJ 400014-10]
  2. Vroomen White Design [CRDPJ 400014-10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Racing bicycles have evolved significantly over the past decades as technology and cyclists' comfort have become a critical design issue. Although ample research has been conducted on comfort for other means of transportation, cyclists' perception of dynamic comfort has received scant attention in the scientific literature. The present study investigates how enthusiast cyclists conceptualize comfort using an online survey with 244 respondents. The purpose is to determine which factors contribute to comfort when riding a bicycle, to identify situations in which comfort is relevant and to determine the extent to which vibrations play a role in comfort evaluations. We found that comfort is influenced by factors related to bicycle components (specifically the frame, saddle and handlebar), as well as environmental factors (type or road, weather conditions) and factors related to the cyclist (position, adjustments, body parts). Respondents indicated that comfort is a concern when riding a bicycle in most situations and they believed that comfort is compatible with performance. The PCA analysis shows that for the perception human factor-body parts are put in evidence, and the cyclist's comfort evaluation is mainly based on certain qualities related to the bicycle components, then the road and external conditions (e.g. weather, temperature). (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available