4.0 Article

INFLUENCE OF CERVICAL SPINE POSITION, TURNING TIME, AND CERVICAL SEGMENT ON CADAVER INTRADISCAL PRESSURE DURING CERVICAL SPINAL MANIPULATIVE THERAPY

Journal

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.06.005

Keywords

Cervical vertebrae; Manipulation; Spinal; Pressure; Posture; Time

Funding

  1. Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Guangdong Province, China [20111087]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2011106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine influences of cervical spine positions, turning times, and cervical segments on cadaver intradiscal pressure (IDP) during cervical spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Methods: We simulated cervical SMT with stretching and rotation on 7 fresh adult cadaver specimens in the material test system machine. The changes in IDP for cervical intervertebral disks (C-3/4, C-4/5, and C-5/6) during 4 different stages of cervical SMT (physiologic state, end of the traction stage, turning stage, and finish time) were monitored. Five different cervical positions (extension 20 degrees, extension 10 degrees, neutral position, flexion 10 degrees, flexion 20 degrees) and 3 different turning times (0.06, 0.11, 0.16 second) of IDP were monitored, using micropressure sensors. Results: The variable tendency of cervical IDP presents a V-shaped curve during SMT. The 4 stages of SMT had significantly different IDP (F = 5498.956; P < .001). There were also significant differences in IDP between 5 cervical positions ([F = 1371.216; P < .001], [flexion 20 degrees > flexion 10 degrees > neutral position > extension 10 degrees > extension 20 degrees]), 3 turning times ([F = 419.530; P < .001], [0.06 > 0.11 > 0.16 seconds]), and 3 cervical segments ([F = 84.282; P < .001], [C-3/4 < C-4/5 < C-5/6]). Intradiscal pressure was lowest at 20 degrees extension combined with a turning time of 0.16 second. Conclusion: Different cervical positions, turning times, and cervical segments largely influence IDP during the process of SMT. Further research using human subjects should determine if these findings contribute to greater patient comfort, safety, and clinical efficacy with SMT. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2012;35:428-436)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available