4.2 Article

Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer: Parallels Between Normal Development and Tumor Progression

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAMMARY GLAND BIOLOGY AND NEOPLASIA
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 117-134

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10911-010-9178-9

Keywords

Epithelial-Mesenchymal transition; Epithelial plasticity; Breast cancer metastasis; Branching morphogenesis

Funding

  1. Department of Defense [W81XWH-06-1-0757, W81XWH-08-1-0332]
  2. National Cancer Institute [2RO1-CA095277]
  3. American Cancer Society [RSG-07-183-01-DDC]
  4. Susan G. Komen Foundation [BCTR0707562]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

From the earliest stages of embryonic development, cells of epithelial and mesenchymal origin contribute to the structure and function of developing organs. However, these phenotypes are not always permanent, and instead, under the appropriate conditions, epithelial and mesenchymal cells convert between these two phenotypes. These processes, termed Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), or the reverse Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition (MET), are required for complex body patterning and morphogenesis. In addition, epithelial plasticity and the acquisition of invasive properties without the full commitment to a mesenchymal phenotype are critical in development, particularly during branching morphogenesis in the mammary gland. Recent work in cancer has identified an analogous plasticity of cellular phenotypes whereby epithelial cancer cells acquire mesenchymal features that permit escape from the primary tumor. Because local invasion is thought to be a necessary first step in metastatic dissemination, EMT and epithelial plasticity are hypothesized to contribute to tumor progression. Similarities between developmental and oncogenic EMT have led to the identification of common contributing pathways, suggesting that the reactivation of developmental pathways in breast and other cancers contributes to tumor progression. For example, developmental EMT regulators including Snail/Slug, Twist, Six1, and Cripto, along with developmental signaling pathways including TGF-beta and Wnt/beta-catenin, are misexpressed in breast cancer and correlate with poor clinical outcomes. This review focuses on the parallels between epithelial plasticity/EMT in the mammary gland and other organs during development, and on a selection of developmental EMT regulators that are misexpressed specifically during breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available