4.2 Article

Capybara social structure and dispersal patterns: variations on a theme

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages 12-20

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1644/09-MAMM-S-420.1

Keywords

capybaras; dispersal; Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris; intraspecific variation; social structure

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Fullbright Scholarship
  3. Whitney R. Harris World Ecology Center at the University of Missouri-St. Louis
  4. Raul Leoni Scholarship
  5. Overseas Research Student Award (CVCP)
  6. Cambridge Overseas Trust
  7. Weis-Fogh Fund
  8. CONICIT
  9. Queens' College Cambridge
  10. Cambridge Philosophical Society
  11. Deanery for Research and Development (DID) at Universidad Simon Bolivar, Caracas, Venezuela

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Capybaras, (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) are large, herbivorous New World hystricomorphs, common in the seasonally flooded savannas of tropical and subtropical South America. In this paper we review the social structure and dynamics of capybaras across much of their geographic range. Wherever they have been studied capybaras live in groups. Capybara groups are stable social units composed of adult males and females (sex ratio biased toward females) with their young. A linear dominance hierarchy characterizes interactions among males, and the dominant male obtains most matings. Group sizes range from 6 to 16 adult members and vary with habitat characteristics and population density. At higher densities group sizes and the proportion of floaters (apparently unaffiliated animals; mostly males) increase. In 1 low-density location dispersal appears to occur in groups of both sexes, whereas in another location, where density is higher, males disperse and females are philopatric. We also discuss more conceptual issues (mostly proximate and ultimate mechanisms) that relate to intraspecific variation in social behavior in general, and capybaras in particular.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available